Mitt won’t say it, but I will!


Mitt Romney

I began this post last week as a way of explaining the significance of what I felt could happen in the South today. Now, as the final votes are counted, I am deeply disappointed for reasons that are far more important than vote counts and delegate tallies. Sure, I had hoped that endorsements of governors and former governors were going to make the impossible happen. When Alabama’s Randy Owen and redneck favorite, Jeff Foxworthy stepped in to help, my confidence rose even further. Despite the letdown, my disappointment comes from a different place than the numbers flashing by at the bottom of our TV screens. It comes from the place where pride in one’s heritage establishes itself at an early age and grows inside us as we mature from child to adult. There is something inside us that makes us want to be loyal to where we come from, to our family, to our tribe, our homeland, even our team. When any of those disappoints us, it hurts.

With those feelings in mind, I decided to check for comments on the wonderful Web site Evangelicals for Mitt, where the post by Nancy French made me feel better in an instant. She puts things in the proper perspective, telling us that Mississippi will always have a soft place in her heart, for it was there that her husband proposed to her. I will always have a soft spot for Alabama, for that is where I was born and grew up. My roots there go back many generations to several families who settled there in the early 19th century.

Nevertheless, there is something that still needs to be said. I begin with some important questions, asked not in bitterness, nor as a simple way to get things off my chest. I ask them in the hope that a few more people might help press for needed answers, which in turn will help us find a solution to some very serious problems.

So, when are the media going to describe Mitt Romney’s “problem” exactly for what it is? Who is going to step up and explain why he is not winning the Republican primaries in a landslide? Rather than simply dancing around the central issue with coy references to his supposed “weakness” as a candidate, who is going to look at the facts squarely in the face and recognize that bigotry is alive and well in the United States of America in the 21st Century?

After writing those words I had second thoughts about using the term bigotry, but recent events and a quick glance at the Merriam-Webster online dictionary convinced me otherwise. A bigot is:

A person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices; especially one who regards or treats the members of a group (as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance

Based on that definition, I decided to use the term very purposefully. The first reason is that I have a vivid recollection of bigotry in two very important contexts. Second, things are happening in this election season that are either sustained by bigotry or seek to take advantage of its awful consequences.

Two years after I was born in Montgomery, my parents moved to Tallassee, a small town that was for many years about an hour’s drive northeast of Montgomery. Google Maps says that it now takes 39 minutes via the freeway, a significant improvement over the country roads I experienced growing up. Eight years later we moved for a couple of years to another small town, DeFuniak Springs, Florida which is located in the panhandle part of the state. We returned to Montgomery in 1958 when I was 12. Because we had not owned a television and had moved away from Montgomery, I was only vaguely aware of the boiling race issues of the day. The heroism of Rosa Parks and the Montgomery Bus Boycott is something I experienced only by word of mouth. I vaguely recall that people who spoke of those events did not always use the fondest of terms. The one thing I do remember vividly, however, was seeing separate drinking fountains and restrooms for the “coloreds,” as well as the balcony seating at the Mt Vernon Theater in Tallassee, which my mother managed. My father managed the Tala-C Drive-In Theater, which was on the outside of town. “Colored people” could buy tickets there, but they had to park on the back row.

I also remember very well the Freedom Riders coming into Montgomery and getting attacked by a mob of white protesters at the Greyhound Bus Station just five blocks from where we lived in 1961. I remember hearing in 1963 about Bull Connor and his police attack dogs and fire hoses up in Birmingham as well as George Wallace standing in the doorway at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa. By the time the Selma to Montgomery civil rights marches came along, I was in college and can remember the television images of marchers getting attacked with billy clubs and tear gas at the Edmund Pettus Bridge that crosses the Alabama River in Selma.

All that might sound a little like Forrest Gump and his mythical coming of age in Alabama, but unlike Forrest, I was not in any of the TV coverage of those events. Nevertheless, bigotry is something I know. Growing up in the middle of it, however, I was a bit like the fish who doesn’t know he is in the water. The importance of those various events was not something I was sufficiently aware of until later in my life. In fact, it was only while I was serving as a missionary in France from July 1966 through December, 1968, that I really began to understand what I had lived through.

While in France and when people learned that I was from Alabama, it seemed at the time that they would invariably come up with innumerable questions concerning what was going on. Pictures of the Selma to Montgomery marches, combined with the reputation of Governor George Wallace, provided the opening for the conversations we had. People were also curious about the riots in Newark, New Jersey, and Detroit, Michigan, where Mitt’s dad, George, was serving as governor at the time. Those riots happened in 1967 and Martin Luther King Jr. was killed in April, 1968. Robert F. Kennedy was assassinated in San Francisco two months later after winning the California Presidential Primary. The combined effect of all of those tragedies prompted questions from more people than I could imagine. “If you are from Alabama, why do you hate black people?” I of course truthfully denied having any such feelings. Nevertheless, those interactions prompted deep reflection on what I had seen and experienced growing up in Alabama.

Fortunately, that somewhat dramatic story has a happy ending. When I returned from France and attended Auburn University, which had been integrated during my 30-month absence, I became friends with a black student who was in our physics class. I am happy to say that he was included as a member of our small study group, and I cannot remember a single comment from anyone regarding the color of his skin. The other students were from small towns around the state of Alabama, so such an outcome might have been a surprise to my questioners in France. This young man was just one of the guys struggling to learn college physics, as were we all.

The year my wife and I were married, we attended church services in Montgomery at the Dexter Avenue Baptist Church where Martin Luther King Jr. had been a pastor from 1954 to 1960. I am sure that my mother had told me this, but it was only recently that I became fully aware that it was in that church that King organized the Montgomery Bus Boycott that began in 1955, initiating the long process of redress for the injustices that blacks had suffered in the South. My heart filled with pride that December day in 1971 as I met members of the church and listened to the sermon, feeling that my state had successfully navigated the challenging times of the 1950s and 60s.

The end of the second story is unfolding as I finish this piece and the results of the Republican Primaries in Alabama and Mississippi are being announced. I just looked up from my computer and saw the headline of the Drudge Report on the screen of the computer where my wife is working, “Rick Double in South. This outcome was to be expected given the previews we have seen from South Carolina and Tennessee, but I had been hopeful that my beloved South would come through in the end. Mitt seemed to be well received in ways much friendlier than many had predicted.

To digress for a moment, this second story has its beginning at the end of the 19th Century. Mormon missionaries were leaving their settlements in Utah to go out across the world, including the southern United States, where their reception was not always on the friendliest of terms. My mother, my sister, and I had joined The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in Montgomery when I was 12. I later learned that my great-grandparents had joined in 1900, and just a few years before their time, a missionary, Joseph Standing, had been killed by a mob in Varnell, Georgia, on July 21, 1879. On August 10, 1884, in Cane Creek, Tennessee, four people were killed by an attacking mob, including two missionaries and a local member of the Church. Just recently a neighbor sent me a file containing the journal of his grandfather, Wayne Hardison Redd, who had been a missionary in the South in the late 1890s and had kept a very detailed journal. Looking through the pages, I discovered that he had lived and preached in the same area where my grandparents joined the Church two years later. I also read of mobs breaking up meetings and threatening the missionaries. Here is one excerpt:

Had quite a long chat with Lawyer Flanigen. He showed me an article in the paper where the Missippi Conference had been broken up by an armed mob of 250 men led by a Baptist Minister.

Here are a couple of references to Redd’s personal experiences:

Fasted as usual this morning.  Left Mr. Smith with an invitation to call again.  Walked a few miles up to Bro John Gigers but found him gone.  So we went on 1 mile farther to a friend’s.  He was also gone.  While we were sitting on some lumber in his yard, resting, there came up two young fellows on horseback and said they would advise us to leave there, as the people in this neighborhood was very much opposed to us and was liable to mob us; but this did not scare us much as they were the ones that had made threats before and they only wanted to scare us.

He speaks of getting a birthday cake from his wife in Utah and sharing it with his missionary companions after which they repaired their bowery which a mob had burned the night before. Here is one final entry:

Elder S. R. Brown told me tonight all about the mob that attacked him and elder Spencer on the night of April 10, in Crenshaw Co.  While returning home from a meeting with some saints.  The mob was masked and loaded to the muzzel with hickory clubs Guns and pistols.  They ordered them to strip their coats, But after their coats were off, by the spirit of God they persuaded them to let them go by promising to leave the state as soon as they could.  They walked all night and arrived at Bro. Bradley’s just this morning.  The governor is looking up the case and we hear he has some of them arrested.

While mobs no longer rage in the South, feelings of ill will are only obliquely mentioned in the press (“Romney fails to attract the ‘very conservative’ in South Carolina”). People looking at that will often exclaim that this does not mean that these people oppose Mitt on religious grounds, punctuating their objections that the most religious people happen to also be the most conservative. Indeed, as any statistics professor will explain early in whatever introductory course they might teach, correlation does not indicate causality. The evidence that the correlation means something more in this case, however, seems clearer than many will accept.

Providing an interesting perspective on the problem of Mitt’s religion, a research study at Vanderbilt University determined that “Bias against Mormonism may not keep Romney out of White House.” Nevertheless, the study reported that “20% of Republicans nationally would not vote for a ‘qualified Mormon’ for president.” That number rises to “31 percent of Southern evangelical Republicans” and tracks quite well with what we are seeing in the exit polls from Republican Primaries so far in various states.

To get a better idea of what is going on, I created the chart below from the various CNN Exit and Entrance Polls for this year’s Republican Primaries to analyze preferences among people who classify themselves as “White Evangelical/Born-Again Christian.” As shown, Mitt wins among these three candidates in those states where the concentration of Evangelical voters is less than 40%, but he falls way behind in the others. These also happen to be states that fit into one of two categories. First, in the case of New Hampshire, the state knows him well. Second, Nevada and Arizona each have above average-sized Mormon populations, which come to 6.4% for Nevada and 5.8% for Arizona. For comparison purposes, Georgia’s population is 0.7% Mormon. The higher concentrations in Nevada and Arizona perhaps reduce the “weirdness” factor of Mitt’s religion, and brings more Evangelicals to vote for him.

Looking at a video on the topic, however, we see comments by Professor Black, as well a couple of interviews that tell a slightly different story. In particular, the video illustrates what Morrill failed to include in his article: Mitt’s religion is indeed an issue for him in the South.

We get from that video a balanced view of what a few people in the South think of Mitt Romney and his candidacy. Beginning at 32 seconds in, one of the interviewees reveals the specific problem that Mitt faces:

I have some faith issues that are important to me, that he becomes a non-starter for me, that I’m more in line with Rick Santorum’s faith and values.

One has to ask: What is there in Mitt Romney successful family life and marriage of 43 years that will not pass muster for the most religious and conservative among us? Unfortunately, such phrasing now has been turned into a sort of code that communicates a very pernicious, sub rosa message.

Regrettably, this should not come as a surprise, given the history of the South I have already cited Indeed, the only surprise is that so many commentators and supposed experts continue to downplay the importance of the issue. As one more example, Lowell Brown, writing at Article VI Blog Tuesday evening, discussed the “elephant in the room” in the context of an interview that Bill Bennett did on Monday with Byron York on Bennett’s radio show. After discussing the primary elections in some detail:

They two of them eventually got to a fascinating question:  Why does Santorum, a Catholic, win the Evangelical vote, but lose Catholics to Romney?  The two wise men went over a wide range of possible reasons. Not once did they mention Evangelical bias against Romney over his Mormonism.

This is certainly not news to Mitt, who has not only seen the elephant in the room, but the animal’s feet have now have trampled and stomped on him on several occasions. He has expected opposition from the right on religious grounds since he first ran in 2008, but that opposition has been mostly silenced this time around. Despite the absence of more overt discussions and commentary, former Senator Robert Bennett from Utah recently said in an interview that religion plays an unfortunate part in the challenges Mitt faces. He quoted a political contact of his, who said that “If Mitt Romney were Presbyterian, he would be the Republican nominee.”

As the caucuses and primaries come and go, this fact remains ever present but hardly ever spoken: Not only would Mitt be the nominee were it not for the bigotry among us, he would be winning these contests by a landslide. Where he wins by sheer force of will (and yes, money!), his competitors are playing the game a bit differently. The most recent sad example comes from Pastor O’Neal Dozier from Florida who has called on Mitt to renounce his religion. Others are more subtle and of the “He does not share my values!” variety.

Whether directed at Mitt’s money, at his religion, or at him as a person, the prejudice we are seeing is real and ugly. It is reflected in the ballot box and exit polls, and now seems to be turning into an ugly stain on the carpet of our body politic. As a people, we have thrived in our great shrine of freedom of “government of the people, by the people, for the people” so beautifully described by Abraham Lincoln and built and sustained by the wisdom of our founding fathers. Their wisdom, inspired by a loving Father in Heaven, has given us the precious freedom that enables each of us to be who we want to be as well as to work and worship, which are all fundamental to our country.

Unfortunately, we are now witnessing something that is worse than prejudice and bigotry: An effort that has already met with some success to use that bigotry as a political tool to prevent someone like Mitt from providing the sort of leadership his record shows that he can provide. I will be providing some specific and alarming examples.

This entry was posted in Election 2012, Mitt, the Mormon by Mike. Bookmark the permalink.

About Mike

Michael Bush first met Mitt in 1966 when they reported for a one-week training session in Salt Lake City before heading to France on the 4th of July to serve as missionaries for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints for 2 1/2 years. They also served at the same time in Bordeaux for several months in 1968, where they worked together quite often. Mike is on the faculty of Brigham Young University and grew up in Alabama. He graduated from Brigham Young University in Political Science. He also has an MBA from the University of Missouri and a PhD from The Ohio State University in Foreign Language Education with an emphasis in Computer Science. He is a retired Air Force Lieutenant Colonel who spent most of his career at the US Air Force Academy teaching French and doing research in the area of computer-assisted language learning. He and his wife Annie have four children and 18 grandchildren. It goes without saying that the things written on this site reflect his views and opinions and are in no way intended to reflect those of Brigham Young University or its sponsor, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

16 thoughts on “Mitt won’t say it, but I will!

  1. As a transplant to the South, albeit, for more than 40 years, I have come to realize how much religion plays a role in the lives of most southerners. The irony is their intolerance of anyone who doesn’t subscribe to their brand of Christianity. Only in the last several decades did they accept Catholicism, and that came about because of demographics and their common anti-abortion position. Mitt is facing that “bigotry,” but he will be our nominee, and these southerners will vote for him.

    Of course, there is another issue: Southerners are less educated and more blue collar, a constituency more favorable to Santorum who is using religion as his calling card and as a subtle weapon against Romney. Santorum is a ruthless man and will continue to be a thorn in Mitt’s side until he is no longer a viable candidate.

    My advice to Mitt: Continue to go hard against Obama and avoid mention of Santorum except to refute his outright lies.

  2. Mike, thank you for your objective research; unfortunately, it confirms what I too have suspected based on exit polling. If the media would talk about “the elephant in the room,” people may be able to better recognize it and change for the better. Do you have any ideas on how to encourage the media to say it as it is?

  3. Very good write up. It is too bad there is so much hate and misunderstanding in our country. One would have thought, this being the 21st century that people would be better educated on our past mistakes. Mitt Romney has proven himself to be a better person when he takes the “high” road and does not respond to such hatefulness. The people however, cannot deny Mitt Romney of the huge dent though he put into the “deep” south. That alone is success. I have faith, although sometimes I get discouraged, that things will work out, and the American people will get to know Mitt Romney better. And perhaps, while they are getting to know him beter, they can get to know the Mormon faith a little better too. It helps to know the facts, from reliable sources. Thank you for sharing this.

  4. Mike, this is the most insightful article ever written about the “elephant in the room,” with regards to Mitt Romney. I’m not a Mormon, but I highly respect the faith and history of its people leading up to Romney. There are no true, quantifiable substantive negatives about Mitt Romney. I believe that anti-Romney means anti-Mormon, which in the larger issue means an embarrassing lack of tolerance and understanding about the LDS religion both in the media and along the political spectrum.

  5. Very interesting piece indeed, Mike! I like the way you put together personal experience, journal entries and the findings showing how things really are.

    I find myself explaining the same thing over here in France. It’s so obvious that religion is the problem that commentators, campaigns don’t necessarily have to mention it for everyone to understand it. Indeed, without his Mormonism the race would have been over. It’s incredible that things that you’d think would be considered a solid GOP candidate’s strength in normal political situations (considerable endorsements, ability to raise money, managing experience in the private sector, etc.) are either relegated to the second plan or presented as weaknesses when it comes down to Romney. Now, this may be beyond religion but I just couldn’t believe that Gingrich hates Romney so much that he went on to air that devastatingly manipulative documentary called “When Mitt Romney Came to Town”. Michael Moore couldn’t have done better!

    The above said, I really am wondering why Romney is running so much after the Evangelicals. Why is he trying so much to get their blessing? Why doesn’t he pull a John McCain? In 2008, McCain didn’t try to win over that electorate during the primary because he knew it was a lost cause trying to battle Huckabee on that front. I mean, eventually, Romney will have to come back to the center, where elections are decided. As the polls have shown, he is already loosing ground among independents.

  6. Thanks for writing about what so many of us struggle with. Not just Mormons bit many minorities. William Hardison Redd was my great-grandfather and was probably related to Wayne Redd. I would hope that our country could elect a Mormon in the same way we elected Barrack Obama. It would be a tribute to our country to have Mitt as our GOP candidate. I think he will do it and that this bigotry in our country will be lessened as we unite and vote for the man best to go up against the present problems that face our country. Again thanks for saying what so many of us fear in our hearts.

  7. Mike,

    Thank you for articulating this so well as obviously Mitt cannot without attracting increased criticism. This prejudice, evident in last night’s exit polls where a large percentage of voters state that defeating President Obama is their most important issue and that an o

  8. Mike,

    Thank you for articulating this so well as obviously Mitt cannot without attracting increased criticism. This prejudice, evident in last night’s exit polls where a large percentage of voters state that defeating President Obama is their most important issue, runs counter their expressed political objectives.

    When asking when the media will acknowledge the existence of religious bigotry and its effect on this race, we should also ask when they will address its very obvious use as a political tool by a candidate seeking our country’s highest office. It’s disturbing that such a candidate would be able to gather enough support to become remotely competitive as it would indicate that while many people may not be guilty of religious bigotry, they do not object to its existence or use by a presidential candidate.

    I have faith that Mitt can win the nomination. However, it will be a sad commentary on the state of our country if the most qualified candidate to seek the presidency in a very long time is denied that opportunity as a result of another candidate’s success capitalizing on the failure of certain citizens to look beyond their own prejudices.

  9. Pingback: Diigo Bookmarks 03/15/2012 « Conservative First

  10. Your column conveys the same sense of deep sadness I felt after the southern primaries. The results weren’t about geography or politics or party – they were about religious bigotry. I’ve seen it, I’ve heard it, I’ve lived it. One need only drive through the Deep South and survey the reader boards in front of many of the churches: “Today’s Sermon: The Cult of Mormonism,” etc. Or visit the hardcore Evangelical and Southern Baptist websites and blogs: “A Vote for Romney Is A Vote for Satan,” etc. You get the picture. Fifty years ago, it was the Catholics. Today, it’s the Mormons. And, of course, the Jews have always been granted a prime seat in the pew of southern bigotry. Anti-Mormonism is a regular part of southern Sunday School curriculum– from childhood, these congregations are fully indoctrinated. Again, I’ve heard it and I’ve seen it on many occasions. Over recent years, I’ve come to sort of like Mike Huckabee, but I always thought it suspicious that, in the 2008 campaign, when the media asked to see the text of some of his Baptist minister sermons, they had all apparently been “accidentally” lost in a fire.

    It’s true that Southern racial bigotry is fading with each new generation but it is clearly not gone and has, fortunately, at least become publicly unacceptable. But religious bigotry is alive and well, particularly in the South. In fact, in pockets throughout the entire country, you will find well-developed anti-Mormonism industries – brochures, movies, books, conferences – produced, sold and shipped all over by people paid a salary to save America from that “evil cult of Joe Smith’s.” And even a superficial investigation demonstrates the following: the anti-Mormon industry is predominantly promulgated and funded by the Far Right Evangelical community – with a lot of help from the Baptists. It seems for too many that being “born again” has brought a rebirth of bigotry, this time not based on race, but on religion. And Heaven help the Muslim whose company sends him to take over the MIssissippi office…

    What is wrong with the South? How is it that the poison of prejudice so often emerges from such a beautiful part of this country? Has it never recovered from losing the war? Is it, even yet, seeking retribution? An entire culture still looking for a scapegoat? I recall a scene from the 1988 movie “MIssissippi Burning” where the FBI agent raised in the South (Gene Hackman) tells the FBI agent from the North (William Defoe) that his own father had once burned down a Black worker’s farm for no reason except that it was beginning to thrive. The father explained: “If I can’t be better than a N—–, than what am I?” (paraphrased) It seems that the bitter southern prejudice towards Mormons (and others) found most strongly in the South is just more of the same: a desperate need to feel power or superiority over someone else. And as I write these words, I still can’t begin to understand bigotry of such depth and magnitude, above all, in the context of religion.

    The great expose that has not yet been written is the story of American anti-Mormonism – particularly, Southern – sadly from so many who profess to be Christian. To denigrate a major faith so clearly based on Christian values is an embarrassment to me – as a Southerner, as an Evangelical, and as an American. This story, which is the ugly underbelly of this Presidential campaign, needs to be thoroughly investigated and told – it will be the next Pulitzer Prize winner.

    I’m going to vote for MItt Romney. He’s seriously smart, experienced, conservative, honorable, and, yes, Christian enough for me. (If he says he believes in Christ, who but God can say otherwise?) And he’ll be a great President. But I am also struck by his profound courage – he is blazing a trail to religious tolerance in this country that is long overdue. I believe in America and I’m proud of her – but I’m also ashamed of some of its chapters – the American Indians and the Blacks, to name just two. If getting Romney elected helps close another of our shameful chapters – the persecution of the Mormons – I consider it a duty and an honor to be a part of this long-overdue progress as a country and a people. And if the South – those who, even now, cannot embrace what Lincoln called “the better angels of our nature” – cost this country the leadership of a man like Mitt Romney, it will not be a literal assassination of a President, but the consequences to this nation will be the same.

    • The sad thing is that Southern racial bigotry is not fading and trust me those that hate will vote for a white anything before a black man. I am amazed by all the people that are so disturbed when people question Romney’s faith, but continue to question our current President’s faith, birth, love of country. I lived in Utah for a few years, and yes they have some strange beliefs (magic underwear, 3 heavens, becoming gods – only men of course) – of course no stranger than dinosaurs are a hoax and the earth is 6000 years old. Everyone should have the freedom to believe what they want and that is why your religious beliefs should not be a litmus test for your ability to lead all the people of all faiths – we don’t elect a national pastor, but a national leader of our people and government.

  11. Pingback: Mitt’s Opponents Use Bigotry for Political Benefit | Mitt: The Man

  12. Pingback: Political Campaigns and Easter Week | Mitt: The Man

  13. Pingback: Stupid is as Stupid Does | Mitt: The Man

  14. The look for the web site is a bit off in Epiphany. Even So I like your site. I might have to use a normal browser just to enjoy it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *